Legal Opinion

Toms v. Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1989No. Appeal No. 331 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Neil and Nancy Toms challenge the Washington Township Zoning Ordinance as exclusionary, alleging that it failed to make any provision for a trash transfer station. The Washington Township Board of Supervisors rejected the Toms’ challenge and proposed curative amendment, concluding that the existing zoning ordinance permitted the use in question. The court of common pleas affirmed without taking additional evidence.1 We reverse and remand.

The undisputed facts are reflected by the board’s findings. The trial court succinctly summarized them as follows:

*167In November of 1985,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Casey v. ZONING HEAR. BD. OF WARWICK TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. General Battery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Tohickon Valley Transfer, Inc. v. Tinicum Township ZonIng Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Council of Middletown Township v. BenhamCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Cracas v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eastern Consolidation & Distribution Services, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API