Legal Opinion

Winston v. McCormick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Blackford, J. —

Assumpsit against Winston for goods sold and delivered, money had and received, &c.

The suit was commenced in December, 1845.

Plea, that the causes of action did not, nor did either of them, accrue within five years next before the commencement of the action. General demurrer to the plea, and judgment for the plaintiff.

The limitation of actions of assumpsit on unwritten contracts is, by the act of 1843, six years. R. S. 1843, p. 686.

The defendant, however, contends, that this suit, though commenced in 1845, is, as to the time for commencing it, governed by the act of 1838 under…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aaron v. City of TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wilmont v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hibler v. Globe American Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Keater v. Hock, Musser & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  5. Oberg v. D. O. McComb & SonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API