Legal Opinion

Linsey v. E.F. Hutton & Co.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 30, 1989No. 87-0743-CivPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNTS II AND III

HASTINGS, District Judge.

THIS MATTER came to be heard upon Defendants’, Curt D. Mosow and E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) Motions to Dismiss Counts II and III, based upon Plaintiff’s, Joseph M. Linsey (hereinafter “Linsey”) failure to file an amended Federal RICO claim. After careful consideration of the motions and a thorough review of the case law cited by defense counsel, this Court hereby DENIES the motions to dismiss for the reasons set forth below.

I. POSTURE OF THE CASE

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Stowell v. Ted S. Finkel Investment Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
  5. Viscomi v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API