Legal Opinion
In Re Spann Contempt
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 8, 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
183 N.J. Super. 62 (1982)
443 A.2d 239
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTEMPT OF RONALD M. SPANN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 9, 1982.
Decided March 8, 1982.
Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.
John A. Ridley argued the cause for appellant (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan and Purcell, attorneys; John A. Ridley of counsel; Helen Lukievics on the brief).
Arlene R. Weiss, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. NashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. De BonisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- In Re YengoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Madden v. Township of DelranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State v. VaskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- State v. NilsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- State of New Jersey v. Western World, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Matter of DanielsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.