Legal Opinion

Madden v. Township of Delran

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 10, 1992PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

WILENTZ, C.J.

The question before us is whether this Court should order government to pay attorneys who are assigned by the municipal court to represent defendants too poor to pay for counsel. Assuming our power to do so, we nevertheless conclude that the answer is no, at least not now. We reach that conclusion in view of the substantial number of municipalities presently making such payments or providing public defenders without being so ordered; in view of the probable increase in the number of municipalities that will do so in the future; and in view…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenberg v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. RushSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATTSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. CannonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. In the Matter of the Adoption of a Child by J.E v. and D.G.V.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. D.N. v. K.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API