Bailey v. Beck
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Error from Crawford .District Court. Action by Beoh against Bailey, to recover a balance alleged to be due on an account for sawing lumber, and for work and labor. Trial at January Term, 1877, and'verdict and judgment for plaintiff. New trial denied, and Bailey brings the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The plaintiff in error, defendant below, claims that the verdict of the jury upon which the judgment of the court below in this ca'se was rendered, was found by the jury in the following manner, to wit:
“The jury in said cause, while in the jury room deliberating on' their verdict, agreed that each juror should mark down the amount he thought the plaintiff below, defendant in error, ought to recover from the defendant as damages, and that then such amounts should be added together and the aggregate sum thereof should be divided by twelve,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Perry v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Cowles v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kansas City, Wyandotte & Northwestern Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Newell v. City Ice Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- City of Kinsley v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Schaake v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.