Palmer v. . Lowe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, I.
The plaintiff is a nonresident of this State; the Crunden-Martin Manufacturing Company is a foreign corporation; the defendant, Lowe, is a citizen and resident of Cabarrus County. If the suit had been brought against the corporation only,- Mecklenburg would have been the proper venue. O. S., 467. If it had been brought against Lowe as the sole defendant, the proper county would have been Cabarrus. C. S., 469. But Lowe and the corporation are joint defendants. Had the plaintiff a right to determine the place of trial by electing between the two counties ? It may be granted that a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Allen-Fleming Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Hannon v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Harrison v. Carbon Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- McCullen v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitchell v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Hoffman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932