Legal Opinion

Durham v. Hussman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. J. P. Connee, Judge. Action in equity to have canceled a tax deed purporting to convey land which the. plaintiff claims to own. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

On the nineteenth day of May, 1858, Robei’t Craig located a bounty land warrant, issued to one William Long, upon the south half of the northeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter, of section 27, in township 83 north, of range 35 west, in Carroll county. A certificate of location was issued and recorded in the office of the recorder of that county. No patent was issued upon the warrant,' and on the first day of February, 1864, the warrant was canceled and declared void as against the United States by the department of the interior, on account of forgery of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Cornelius v. KesselSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Railway Co. v. McShaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Blumer v. Iowa Railroad Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Schlosser v. HemphillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. L. E. White Lumber Co. v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API