Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 6, 1973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice:

This is an appeal from a conviction in Superior Court. The appellant, Leonard Miller, was charged with possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4725, and was convicted of the lesser included offense of possessing a narcotic drug, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4723.

Appellant’s appeal is predicated upon two grounds: (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the heroin seized by the arresting officers; and (2) the circumstantial evidence adduced at trial is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We cannot agree with either of these…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. State v. ProuseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API