Philippine Refining Corp. v. County of Contra Costa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Three separate actions were brought to recover taxes paid under protest. Said actions were consolidated pursuant to stipulation. The trial court sustained demurrers to the complaints without leave to amend and from the judgment thereafter entered in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.
This appeal involves the question of whether certain cocoanut oil, which was temporarily stored in tanks at Point San Pablo, was subject to local taxation under the circumstances alleged in said complaints. The three complaints were substantially similar in all of their essential allegations and therefore we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial, Sheriff & Tax CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Mexican Petroleum Corp. v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- Southern Pac. Co. v. City of CalexicoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stanton & Sons v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Export Leaf Tobacco Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Cargill of California, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972