Scruggs v. State

Mikell, Judge.

Following his conviction by a jury of armed robbery, two counts of aggravated assault, 1 and criminal trespass, 2 Tyral Scruggs appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial.

1. In his sixth enumeration of error, Scruggs challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence on his armed robbery conviction, arguing that the trial court should have granted his motion for directed verdict.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. We do not weigh the evidence…