Legal Opinion

Garner v. Chicago Consolidated Traction Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 15, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Marcus Kavanagh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytraus

We are of opinion that the occurrence here involved was of such nature that it affords prima facie evidence of negligence on the part of defendants. The res ipsa loquitur doctrine is applicable. The sudden blazing out of the flame from the controller was an unusual and unexpected event and out of the ordinary run of things. The controller, in connection with which the casualty happened, was an appliance or a thing in the exclusive possession and control of, and exclusively managed by, the defendants. Between the defendants and the plaintiff there was a contractual relation, relevant in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railway Co. v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hart v. Washington Park ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stearns v. Ontario Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Barnes v. Danville Street Railway & Right Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. NorthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  2. Kerwin v. Stonington Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Enright v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. Jensen v. East St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  5. Anderson v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API