Legal Opinion

Page v. Spokane City Lines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1957No. 34230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

Quaere: In an action by a passenger against a carrier, does the omission of the bracketed words in the following instruction make it erroneous?

“ . . . if you are unable to determine from the evidence in the case [and the reasonable inferences therefrom] whose negligence, if any, was the proximate cause of the accident, then your verdict must be for the defendant.”

Answer: No.

*309Reasons: Inferences are conclusions drawn from the “evidence in the case,” or, as stated in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (Rawle’s Third Revision, 1914) 1562, an inference is “A conclusion drawn by reason from premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McHenry v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shafer v. National Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. ClemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API