McCurry v. Gold Kist, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THIGPEN, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case.
Eugene McCurry, III, a twenty-four-year-old male with a ninth-grade education, was employed by Gold Kist, Inc., as a laborer. McCurry filed a complaint against Gold Kist in October 1990, alleging that he had contracted an occupational disease as a result of handling condemned chicken parts in his employment with Gold Kist. Gold Kist denied that McCurry’s condition was work-related. The trial court found that although McCurry “is totally disabled and has totally and completely lost the ability to earn a living,” he did not prove that his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Hammons v. Roses Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- T.G.F. v. D.L.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- West Fraser, Inc. v. CaldwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- IPSCO Steel, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Marshall County Department of Human Resources v. J.V.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- State v. Redtop Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006