Legal Opinion

McCurry v. Gold Kist, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 10, 1993No. AV92000233PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

Eugene McCurry, III, a twenty-four-year-old male with a ninth-grade education, was employed by Gold Kist, Inc., as a laborer. McCurry filed a complaint against Gold Kist in October 1990, alleging that he had contracted an occupational disease as a result of handling condemned chicken parts in his employment with Gold Kist. Gold Kist denied that McCurry’s condition was work-related. The trial court found that although McCurry “is totally disabled and has totally and completely lost the ability to earn a living,” he did not prove that his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Hammons v. Roses Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. T.G.F. v. D.L.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  2. West Fraser, Inc. v. CaldwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. IPSCO Steel, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Marshall County Department of Human Resources v. J.V.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  5. State v. Redtop Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API