Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 20, 2020No. 3:20-cv-04629Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAN CLARKE, Case No. 20-cv-04629-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 10 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 11 Defendants. 12 13 Roughly one hundred years ago, as alleged by plaintiff Dan Clarke, defendants Pacific Gas 14 and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation (collectively “PG&E”) left behind hazardous waste 15 created by its manufactured gas plants (“MGPs”) along the northern waterfront of San Francisco. 16 Those plants have long…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.