Legal Opinion

Finton v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company LLC

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 11, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02319Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jenae Finton, et al., No. CV-19-02319-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Cleveland Indians Baseball Company LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs Jenae and Trevor Finton filed a Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees 16 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), A.R.S. § 12-341.01, and LRCiv 54.2. (Doc. 100 at 1). The 17 Court grants the Motion in part. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 From November 2015 to January 2019, Ms. Finton worked for the Cleveland 20 Indians Baseball Company LLC (“the Club”) as a part-time Assistant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Loretta J. Brokeshoulder SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API