People v. Powell
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
It cannot be said that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charge of burglary in the third degree simply because the building housed attorneys’ offices and the front door was unlocked. Subdivision 5 of section 140.00 of the Penal Law provides that “A person who * * * enters or remains in or upon premises which are at the time open to the public does so with license and privilege unless he defies a lawful order not to enter or remain” (emphasis supplied). The jury could find on the evidence before it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- People v. HutchinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- McKay v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- People v. TerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.