Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Kondaur Capital Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 16, 2014No. 13-P-706PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

In this appeal, the plaintiffs, Joseph L. and Mary R. Sullivan (Sullivans), challenge the title of the defendant, Kondaur Capital Corporation (Kondaur), to the Sullivans’ former residence, based on their contention that Kondaur did not hold a valid interest in the mortgage it foreclosed on the property in October, 2009. A judge of the Land Court allowed Kondaur’s motion to dismiss the Sullivans’ amended verified complaint, and thereafter denied (on grounds of futility) the Sullivans’ motion to further amend their complaint. Though several of the Sullivans’ challenges are without merit, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of NebrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Wilson v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Galvin v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Haskins v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  3. Giannasca v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Clockedile v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API