Legal Opinion

In Re Clark Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1999No. Docket 208866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the testator’s third codicil was properly admitted to probate where the testator’s brother—one of the two subscribing witnesses to the codicil—testified against its admission, disavowing the recitations of the codicil’s attestation clause. We conclude that the codicil was properly admitted to probate.

In September 1985, Percy Lee Clark executed his last will and testament. The will made various specific devises, including a $10,000 cash devise to Kevin Watmuf, and devised equal shares of the residue of the estate to the testator’s surviving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abbott v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Johnson v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In Re Dalton EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re Dougherty's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. In Re Mikeska EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Bem EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Menhennick Family Trust v. Timothy MenhennickMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Barbara J Wamsley v. James D MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Scott J Chakmak v. Joan S ChakmakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API