Legal Opinion
Vahle v. Markham
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 4369PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
Defendant moves for leave to file a supplemental answer asserting a counterclaim under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 13(e), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Ernest Vahle, owner of real estate and a business located at 319 Market Street, Philadelphia, died testate in 1929 bequeath*316ing the business and realty to his nephews, Wilhelm Vahle and Henry Vahle. The two cousins owned and operated the business jointly until December 1932, when Wilhelm Vahle returned to Germany with the apparent intention of remaining there permanently.
On May 19, 1944, the Alien Property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. the AntoinettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Cummings v. HardeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Balkan Nat. Ins. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Michigan Tool Co. v. DrummondDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1938
- The BrenneroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Continental Nat. Bank of Lincoln, Neb.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
- Sastre v. Cabrera RaldirisSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953