Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 2, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Carl Hedrick appeals from a judgment of two years in prison for grand larceny.

The appellant and Junior Johnson went to the store of Henry Sherman in the suburbs of London where Johnson bought a dime’s worth of salt. Mrs. Sherman, who was alone .when they entered, went to the rear of the store to get it and when she turned around Hedrick was raising up behind the meat counter within four feet ■of the cash register. Afterward the men purchased ¡some cakes and went out. Within a few minutes Henry Sherman returned from dinner and found his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Clair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Harvey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. House v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API