Hedrick v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner—
Affirming.
Carl Hedrick appeals from a judgment of two years in prison for grand larceny.
The appellant and Junior Johnson went to the store of Henry Sherman in the suburbs of London where Johnson bought a dime’s worth of salt. Mrs. Sherman, who was alone .when they entered, went to the rear of the store to get it and when she turned around Hedrick was raising up behind the meat counter within four feet ■of the cash register. Afterward the men purchased ¡some cakes and went out. Within a few minutes Henry Sherman returned from dinner and found his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Clair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Harvey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- House v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971