Legal Opinion
Barnathan v. Kramer
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
This proceeding, instituted pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 267 of the Town Law and CPLB (art. 78), raises questions (1) whether petitioners are persons aggrieved by th'e decision of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of which they complain, (2) whether the water tower permit issued to the Garden City Park Water District was properly issued under the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of North Hemp-stead. In a companion action petitioners sought an injunction restraining construction of the water tower in question. In affirming denial of a temporary injunction in that action the Appellate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Red Hook Cold Storage Co. v. Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. Town of Estes ParkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- County of Nassau v. South Farmingdale Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In Re the County of Monroe's Compliance With Certain Zoning & Permit RequirementsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Town of Hempstead v. Village of Rockville CentreNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1982