Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Virgin v. County of San Luis Obispo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2000No. 98-55557PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the district court’s dismissal because of a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

*1142 Factual and Procedural Background

Edwin F. Virgin, Sr., Susan S. Virgin, and Edwin F. Virgin, Jr. own land in the County of San Luis Obispo because of federal land patents granted to their predecessors-in-interest. The Virgins appeal the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction over their declaratory relief action against the county and others alleging that the county’s Subdivision Review Board improperly denied their application for a parcel lot line adjustment intended to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. San Luis Unit Food Producers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Beaver v. NPC International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006
  5. (PS) Kidgell v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API