Legal Opinion

State v. Standish

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2005No. 01C52458; A118054PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to suppress evidence seized from several bags found in the truck he was driving at the time of his arrest. The trial court concluded that defendant abandoned any possessory or privacy interest that he had in the bags when he told police officers that he did not own the bags, did not know who did, and did not know what was in them. We defer to the trial court’s findings of historical fact if there is evidence to support them, but assess anew whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ParnellKlamath County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. BernaboCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. SherriffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. Montiel-DelvalleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API