Legal Opinion

Hensley v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1970No. [No. 278, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case is an admitted attempt at an end run around the oft-expressed Maryland doctrine which states, “[T]he owner of land owes no duty to a trespasser or licensee, even one of tender years, except to abstain from wilful or wanton misconduct and entrapment.” The most recent pronouncements of this doctrine are found in Hicks v. Hitaffer, 256 Md. 659, 261 A. 2d 769 (1970), and Mondshour v. Moore, 256 Md. 617, 261 A. 2d 482 (1970). We shall sustain the action of the trial judge who refused to permit the end run.

Appellee, Henkels & McCoy, Inc., is a contractor which on April 12, 1967, was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Braun v. . Buffalo General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Heskell v. Auburn Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Maenner v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Bramble v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Casper v. Charles F. Smith & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Sherman v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Murphy v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API