Robinson's Exr's v. Robards
Supreme Court of Missouri
ERROR to Boone Circuit Coi 3. In order to constitute the conveyance of the horses, hogs, sheep, farming utensils and other personal property, by William Robarás to his son John Robarás, a valid and legal one, so far as the creditors of William Robarás are concerned, the possession of said property must have been delivered to and continued with him after the purchase of the same. 10th section, act concerning fraudulent -onveyances. 2. The conveyance of his personal property,…
Read the full summary
ERROR to Boone Circuit Coi 3. In order to constitute the conveyance of the horses, hogs, sheep, farming utensils and other personal property, by William Robarás to his son John Robarás, a valid and legal one, so far as the creditors of William Robarás are concerned, the possession of said property must have been delivered to and continued with him after the purchase of the same. 10th section, act concerning fraudulent -onveyances. 2. The conveyance of his personal property, horses, hogs, cattle, sheep, farming utensils, &c., by William Robarás to his son John Robarás, in consideration that he…
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.3
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a bill in chancery, filed by the complainants against the defendants, charging substantially, that Wm. Robards, one of the defendants, in December, 1847, was indebted to the complainants in a large sum of money, for which, afterwards, on the 25th August, 1848, a judgment for the sum of $4493 was rendered, on which a special fi. fa. was issued, directing the sale of the lands in the execution mentioned, and if the said lands should be insufficient to satisfy the said execution, then of the remaining lands and tenements, goods and chattels,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Brooks v. WimerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- Stern Auction & Commission Co. v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Briant v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Paul v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gaff v. SternMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882