Legal Opinion

Helms v. Helms

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1994No. 93-1401PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant, Daniel Helms, appeals a Pulaski Chancery decision in favor of appellee, Brenda Helms. Appellee employed her attorney to draw up the property settlement agreement (hereinafter “the agreement”). Appellant paid the attorney $230.00 towards appellee’s attorney’s fees and court costs pursuant to an understanding between appellant and appellee and as outlined in the agreement drafted. Appellant subsequently decided, after signing the agreement that had been drafted by the attorney, that it was detrimental to him. Appellant moved to have the attorney withdrawn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Collie v. CollieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. BarberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Artman v. HoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Cummins Mid-South, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Carden v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API