Legal Opinion

Brant v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1932No. A-8269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Ellis county of the crime of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the reformatory at Granite, Okla., for five years.

Defendant contends, first, that the evidence of the state is insufficient to support the Verdict of the jury, because the accomplice is not sufficiently corroborated.

Defendant was jointly charged with one John Fagala with the larceny of wheat belonging to one Gregory. Fagala, testifying for the state, said that he and defendant took Fagala’s truck and went,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Cloud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Hollingshead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glaze v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Brant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API