Haddock v. Haddock
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. The facts, which involved the full'faith and credit to be given by the courts of the Staté of New York to a decree of divorce, obtained in Connecticut by the husband, formerly a resident of New York, from his wife still residing in New .York, , based,on substituted service'of the summons, are stated in. the opinion. ’ '
1Opinion of the Court 1
201 U.S. 562 (1906)
HADDOCK
v.
HADDOCK.
No. 119.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 11, 1905.
Decided April 12, 1906.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
Mr. Abram J. Rose, with whom Mr. William H. Willits and Mr. Alfred C. Pette were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Henry Willis Smith, with whom Mr. William T. Tomlinson and Mr. William W. Smith were on the brief, for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
The plaintiff in error will be called the husband and the defendant in error the wife.
The wife, a resident of the State of New York, sued the husband in that State in 1899, and…
Also in this document: Dissent · Brown; Dissent · Holmes.
3Cases cited53 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.