Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Burk

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 2000No. 24611-2-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

995 P.2d 1272 (2000)

100 Wash.App. 94

SECURITY STATE BANK, Respondent,

v.

Fred A. BURK and Randelle L. Burk, husband and wife, Appellants.

No. 24611-2-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 24, 2000.

James Arthur Connolly, Connolly, Holm, Tacon & Meserve, Olympia, for Appellants.

Richard Antoine Paroutaud, Mano McKerricher Paroutaud, Chehalis, for Respondent.

SEINFELD, J.

RCW 62A.9-504(3) of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) requires a creditor to dispose of a defaulting debtor's collateral in a "commercially reasonable" manner. We hold that an Article 9 guarantor may assert…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keck v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. AAR Aircraft & Engine Group, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. ReikowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Capital Investment Corp. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. First-citizens Bank & Trust Co, V Bruce A & Sandra J. ReikowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API