Legal Opinion

Dowelanco v. Benitez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 7, 1999No. 13-97-780-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice YÁÑEZ.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed a suit based on a lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant. We reverse and remand.

DowElanco alleges Anacleto Rios Beni-tez (“Rios”), a Mexican citizen, executed a $1,000,000 promissory note payable to DowElanco Mexico in Mexico. The purpose of the note was to secure a line of credit extended by DowElanco Mexico to Rajsa S.A. de C.V., a corporation owned and controlled by Rios. Rajsa distributed insecticides, pesticides, and herbicides purchased from DowElanco Mexico. When Rios…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Schlobohm v. SchapiroTexas Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Angelou v. African Overseas Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. in the Estate of Rosa Elvia GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Laredo Medical Group Corp. v. Mireles, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API