Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Fokes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1990No. A90A0528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

Arthur Holbrook appeals from a defendants’ verdict in this medical malpractice case. His sole enumeration of error below is that the trial court committed fatal error in giving this so-called “hindsight” charge to the jury: “I further charge you that in a medical malpractice action, a defendant cannot be found negligent on the basis of an assessment of the patient’s condition which only later or in hindsight prove [s] to be correct so long as the initial assessment was made in accordance with the reasonable standards of medical care. The concept of negligence does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Jones v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Brannen v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Rooney v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Mercker v. AbendCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Sewell v. INTERNAL MEDICINESupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API