Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wilcox

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Guadalupe. The case was tried before Hon. Isaac B. McFarland, one of the district judges. The facts are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

—This was an action for damages, brought by T. H. & G. B. Hollaman, in the name of the Governor, against the appellee, Wilcox, and his sureties on his official bond, as clerk of the district court of Guadalupe county, for an alleged failure to properly discharge his duty in preparing a cei’tain record for the Supreme Court. The facts statedin the petition are briefly, but substantially,'as follows: That the appellants, being indebted to the firm of Gruman & Co. in the sum of $500, in part payment 0f said debt they transferred to said firm a note on one Andrew Herron for the sum- of $352 49;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graves v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Brown v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Reed v. SamuelsTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. TAC Americas, Inc. v. Boothe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Harris v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  4. Graves v. DraneTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Lejeune, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API