Legal Opinion

Randall v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby. Heard before the Hon. S. K. McSpaddb'n. The facts in the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBrio Kell, C. J.

The original bill was filed to correct a misdescription in a deed conveying lands, and for an injunction against the cutting of timber and. quarrying stone thereon by defendants claiming adversely to the complainants, and for an account and decree for the value of stone and timber which they had taken and removed. A preliminary injunction was granted, and continued to the rendition of the decree from which the appeal is taken, and then made perpetual. During the progress of the cause, a decree was rendered reforming the misdescription in one of the deeds, and a trial at law directed to be had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garner v. PrewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Thompson v. MadduxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyall v. LyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Ex parte GistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API