Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 1924No. 6 Div. 980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomebvidle, J.

Under the uniform decisions of this court, the decree of April 8, 1921 — in which the trial judge stated that he was of the opinion that no partnership existed -between the parties, but that they were engaged in a joint adventure — was not a final decree as to the relation of the parties. Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 South. 885; Bandall v. Hardy, 107 Ala. 476, 19 South 971; Vice v. Littlejohn, 109 Ala. 294, 19 South. 386; Bichardson v. Peagler, 111 Ala. 479, 20 South. 434;'Trump v, McDonnell, 112 Ala. 256, 20 South. 524; Gentry V. Lawley, 142 Ala. 333, 37 South. 829; Threadgill v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Thompson v. MadduxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Tramp v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Vice v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lyall v. LyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Shell Oil Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Cooper v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Bronson v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. McGraw v. McGrawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API