Hill v. Hill
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomebvidle, J.
Under the uniform decisions of this court, the decree of April 8, 1921 — in which the trial judge stated that he was of the opinion that no partnership existed -between the parties, but that they were engaged in a joint adventure — was not a final decree as to the relation of the parties. Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326, 16 South. 885; Bandall v. Hardy, 107 Ala. 476, 19 South 971; Vice v. Littlejohn, 109 Ala. 294, 19 South. 386; Bichardson v. Peagler, 111 Ala. 479, 20 South. 434;'Trump v, McDonnell, 112 Ala. 256, 20 South. 524; Gentry V. Lawley, 142 Ala. 333, 37 South. 829; Threadgill v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Thompson v. MadduxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Tramp v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Vice v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lyall v. LyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Shell Oil Company v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Cooper v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Bronson v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- McGraw v. McGrawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.