Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Parker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1934No. 6 Div. 466PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill seeks a sale of land therein described (one hundred and ninety-five acres) for division among the tenants in common. Section 9331 et seq., Code 1923; Sandlin v. Anders, 210 Ala. 396, 98 So. 299.

All the heirs of T. J. Parker, deceased, and his widow, Martha E. Parker, are parties to the suit, together with Robert L. Sullivan, who is alleged to claim some interest in one hundred and sixty acres of land. The decree orders the sale of the entire tract, and denies to defendant Sullivan any interest therein, and from this decree Sullivan prosecutes the appeal

It appears…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Gilb v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Savage v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Jones v. MatkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Gordon v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Penny v. PennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Salter v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API