Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Pagano

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 13, 1989No. 2—88—0648PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis

This is an appeal by petitioner, Janet Pagano, from the denial of a section 2 — 1401 petition to vacate an order for attorney fees awarded to Rinella & Rinella, Ltd. (Rinella). Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1401 (formerly section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 72)).

On appeal, petitioner contends that (1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter fee awards in the absence of any pleading to seek such awards; (2) Rinella did not have standing in the absence of a fee petition; (3) petitioner was entitled to relief pursuant to section…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. Airoom, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ostendorf v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Petition of Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of PaganoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stevens v. Rooks Pitts and PoustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Heiden v. OttingerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. In Re Marriage of FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Monco v. JanusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API