Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1990No. 90-11PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

The question here presented is whether a district court abused its discretion by entering a divorce decree that provides future automatic modification of child custody from a six-month/six-month joint custody to a nine-month/three-month custody if one parent moves from Laramie, Wyoming. We hold that this provision for automatic future modification is an abuse of discretion and vacate those provisions of the divorce decree.

Appellee, Curtiss William Martin (husband), sought and was granted a divorce from appellant, Sue Ellen Wallis-Martin (wife). The record is brief and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goss v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ayling v. AylingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Fanning v. FanningWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Feaster v. FeasterWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hall v. HallWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Reavis v. ReavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Love v. LoveWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Watt v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API