Legal Opinion

Bond v. Stanton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 6, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Habt, :C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The doctrine that the owner of one lot may acquire an easement over the lot of another by the open, notorious, and adverse use thereof under a claim or right for a period of seven years is well settled in this State. Such adverse user is sufficient to vest the claimant with an easement therein. Clay v. Penzel, 79 Ark. 5, 94 S. W. 765 ; Scott v. Dishough, 83 Ark. 369, 103 S. W. 1153 ; Medlock v. Owen, 105 Ark. 460, 151 S. W. 995 ; and McGill v. Miller, 172 Ark. 390, 288 S. W. 932.

The evidence in this case shows that buildings have been erected upon the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Clay v. PenzelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Medlock v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Scott v. DishoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Linda Elenia Askew Trust v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Duty v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Harrison v. KnottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Abbene v. CohenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. Kirby v. City of HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API