Legal Opinion

United States v. American Packing Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 29, 1953No. Civ. A. 132-52PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of statutory forfeitures and double damages pursuant to sections 3490 and 5438 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231-233. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, an amended complaint was filed. Answers thereto have been filed by the defendants.

The Government now moves, pursuant to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 56 (a, c), 28 U.S.C.A. for entry of summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendants, American Packing Corporation, William Schwartz, Samuel Goldberger, Emanuel Kohn and Adolph Kaplan. The motion is based on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arctic Ice Cream Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. United States v. AccardoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
  3. United States v. KatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. State v. CalvertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Alsco-Harvard Fraud Litigation Consolidated CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API