Legal Opinion

American Medical Ass'n v. Reno

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-1189 SSHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Also before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on Counts I and II of the amended complaint. Plaintiffs challenge a final rule of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) increasing existing registration fees for all handlers of controlled substances; these fees are used to support the DEA’s Diversion Control Program. See 58 Fed.Reg. 15272 (1993) (codified at 21 C.F.R. §§ 1301.11). Specifically, plaintiffs contend that the DEA violated the Administrative Procedure Act…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. City of Dallas v. StanglinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Medical Association v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API