Legal Opinion

Heider v. Hermann Sons Hall Assn.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1932No. Nos. 28,964, 28,965Published

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiff appeals from orders denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought two suits to recover on two separate bonds sold and issued to him by the defendant. The suits were tried together before the court without a jury. We consider them here as one suit. The two bonds are identical in terms, except as to their dates and amounts.

The bonds, after reciting that defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, provide that the defendant “acknowledges itself to owe and for value received hereby promises to pay to the order of George Heider the sum of * * [$1,000 in one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skelton v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Merchants National Bank v. BryngelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Booth v. Union Fibre Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Brown v. BackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API