Booth v. Union Fibre Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal, reported in 137 Minn. 7, 162 N. W. 677, the ease was tried before Callaghan, J., who made findings and dismissed the action. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to compel the defendant to redeem certain of its preferred stock and to pay accumulated dividends upon it. This is its second appearance in this court. When here before the sufficiency of the complaint was sustained. Booth v. Union Fibre Co. 137 Minn. 7, 162 N. W. 677. Upon the trial in the district court there were findings for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
1. The defendant is organized under the laws of Minnesota as a manufacturing corporation. In 1906 it issued to the plaintiff so-called preferred stock. On the former appeal the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Hamlin v. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Vent v. Duluth Coffee & Spice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- McIntyre v. E. Bement's SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Rider v. John G. Delker & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Koeppler v. Crocker Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- William J. Brockington v. Vernon R. Scott, Trustee in Bankruptcy, in the Matter Of: Physicians and Dentists Investment Corporation, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Cring v. Sheller Wood Rim Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- In re Hicks-Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.