Jones v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIONIORDER
BASKIR, Judge.
Plaintiffs, security screeners for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), seek overtime pay in accordance with the overtime compensation scheme set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (2000). Because we find that the plain language in Section 111(d) of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA) unambiguously vests TSA with complete discretion in setting compensation levels for security screeners “notwithstanding any other provision of law,” 49 U.S.C. § 44935 (note), we GRANT Government’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- I.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Richmond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Tarovisky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020