Legal Opinion
Pilson v. City of Prattville
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 10, 2010No. 2090586PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Judge.
The City of Prattville (“the City”) seeks a writ of mandamus ordering the Autauga Circuit Court (“the trial court”) to vacate its order of February 4, 2010. In that order, the trial court ordered the City to authorize pendente lite medical treatment for James Pilson, its employee, pursuant to the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act, Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. (“the Act”). We deny the City’s petition.
Background
On January 25, 2008, Pilson, an employee of the Prattville Police Department, was involved in a motor-vehicle accident during the course of his employment. The City…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Edwards v. Jesse Stutts, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
- Atkins v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hollinghead v. Willstaff, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Durgin v. Fairhope Health & Rehab, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Ex Parte Imerys USA, 2100174 (ala.civ.app. 5-6-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Harper (Ex parte Smalls)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- In re: Isabell Norton Altamira v. Waterville USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.