Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Sibley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 1, 1958No. 4660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

In the previous transfer of this case it was decided that the prospective purchasers were not entitled to specific performance since the consent of the housekeeper, Mrs. Colbath, was a condition precedent to the defendant’s obligation to convey the property. Langdon v. Sibley, 100 N. H. 373. That case is not necessarily determinative of the right of the broker to recover his commission. Anno. 169 A. L. R. 605; Parker v. Estabrook, 68 N. H. 349.

A real estate broker is entitled to his commission if he is the effective cause of procuring a customer willing and able to buy upon the terms proposed…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. KhourySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Guy v. HanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  3. ERA Pat Demarais Associates, Inc. v. Alexander Eastman FoundationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Patterson v. TirolloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Bergeron v. HuntSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API