Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Tirollo
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 17, 1990No. 89-188PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs, Dana A. Patterson and Kenneth E. Berry, appeal the dismissal by the Superior Court (Goode, J.) of their petition for declaratory judgment and the court’s ruling that they are not entitled to prepay their mortgage loan to the defendant, Anthony Tirollo, under the terms of their purchase and sale agreement and promissory note, which were silent on the issue of prepayment. The plaintiffs argue, inter alia, that a promissory note which does not by its express terms restrict prepayment should not be interpreted to do so, and that the purchase and sale agreement should be *625reformed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mills v. Nashua Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- 93 Clearing House, Inc. v. KhourySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Erin Food Services, Inc. v. 688 PropertiesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- DeCato Bros. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Peter Fuller Enterprises, Inc. v. Manchester Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. StrnadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. CarletonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Alexander v. Fujitsu Business Communication Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Whitney Bros. Co. v. David C. Sprafkin and Joan Barenholtz, Trustees of the Bernard M. Barenholtz TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.