Legal Opinion

Linda Mc Company, Inc. v. Shore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 2007No. 4279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITTREDGE, J.:

James and Jan Shore (the Shores) appeal the issuance of an order to execute and levy a judgment against them. The Shores contend the judgment was void, the judgment lacked active energy because it was more than ten years old, there was an accord and satisfaction of the debt, and the Linda Me Company (the Company) should be estopped from denying the accord and satisfaction. We affirm.

I

On December 8,1994, the Shores agreed to give the Company a judgment by confession (the Judgment) as settlement of litigation over unpaid sales commissions. The Judgment was entered on June 2, 1995,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lucas v. RAWL FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. In Re Michael H.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Tremont Const. Co., Inc. v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  4. McDaniel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Allied Funding v. HuemmerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Linda Mc Co., Inc. v. ShoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Equivest Fin., LLC v. RavenelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. Linda Mc Co., Inc. v. ShoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API