Legal Opinion
In Re Tucker
California Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1971No. Crim. 13489Published
1Opinion of the Court
5 Cal.3d 171 (1971)
486 P.2d 657
95 Cal. Rptr. 761
In re PRESTON R. TUCKER on Habeas Corpus.
Docket No. Crim. 13489.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
June 24, 1971.
COUNSEL
Preston R. Tucker, in pro. per., and Dorsey Redland, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, Edsel W. Haws, Nelson P. Kempsky and David Cunningham, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
OPINION
BURKE, J.
Petitioner challenges the revocation of his parole by the Adult Authorty.[1] He was paroled from Folsom Prison in January 1968,…
2Cases cited173 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.