Legal Opinion
Harry W. SPEAR, Appellant, v. Dayton's, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1984No. 83-2522PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Harry W. Spear, formerly employed by Dayton’s, a department store, as a shoe salesman, brought this action contending that Dayton’s had unlawfully reduced his hours of work because of his age (45) and sex. The District Court granted Dayton’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed Spear’s complaint. We agree that no triable claim of sex discrimination was made out, and to that extent we affirm. As to the claim of age discrimination, however, we hold that a verified exhibit attached to Spear’s complaint did raise a genuine issue of material fact, and therefore reverse…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ratner v. YoungDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1979
- Yong Hong Keung ex rel. Yong Lim v. DullesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alexander Jaroma v. James J. Massey, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Onie Mae Ward v. Reginald Moore Mike Russell Ollie CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Harry W. SPEAR, Appellant, v. DAYTON'S, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- ADVANCED OPTICS ELECTRONICS, INC. v. RobinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Williams v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.